Aflatoxicol

Background:Aflatoxicol (AFL) is one of most the important metabolites of aflatoxin B1 (AFB1). AFL can be formed through enzymatic or synthetic reduction of AFB1. Various experimental and theoretical studies have been focused on the AFB1 due to its high toxicity and carcinogenicity.Results:The selective reduction of AFB1 carbonyls, molecular structure of AFL and its effect on toxicity has been studied here by the density functional theory (DFT) method. Although the toxicity of AFL is 18 times lower than that of AFB1, it has been concluded that both molecular structures have similar potency to form an exo-epoxide (AFEP) analogue which can bind to DNA.Conclusion:Calculations revealed that only one of the three possible tautomers of AFL is stable, both in the gas phase and water. The electronic properties of aflatoxicol are calculated as similar to aflatoxin B1 and this may be an explanation of similar carcinogenicity and toxicity of these compounds, which has been proved by experimental results.

Aflatoxins (AF) are toxic fungal secondary metabolites that are pathological to animals and humans. This study identified and quantified AF (AFB(1), AFB(2), AFG(1), AFG(2)) and their hydroxylated metabolites (AFM(1), AFM(2), AFP(1)) and aflatoxicol (AFL) from laying hen breast muscles. Aflatoxins pass from cereal feed to the laying hen tissues, causing economic losses, and from there to humans. To detect the passage of AF from feed to hen breast muscle tissues, an experiment that included 25 Hy-Line W36 121-wk-old hens was performed for 8 d. Hens in individual cages were distributed into 3 groups: a control group, with feed free of AFB(1), and 2 experimental groups, with feed spiked with 2 AFB(1) dosages: 30 µg·kg(-1) (low) or 500 µg·kg(-1) (high). The daily feed consumption per hen was recorded and afterward hens were euthanized and breast muscles were collected, weighed, and dried individually. Aflatoxins were extracted by 2 chemical methods and quantified by HPLC. Both methods were validated by lineality (calibration curves), recovery percentage (>80%), limit of detection, and limit of quantification. The AF (µg·kg(-1)) averages recovered in control breast muscles were as follows: AFB(1) (18); AFG(1), AFM(2), and AFL (0); AFG(2) (1.3); AFM(1) (52), and AFP1 (79). Hens fed with feed spiked with 30 µg·kg(-1) of AFB(1) had AFG(1) (16); AFG(2) (72); AFM(1) (0); AFM(2) (18); AFP(1) (145); and AFL (5 µg·kg(-1)). Hens with feed spiked with 500 µg·kg(-1) of AFB(1) had AFG(1) (512); AFG(2) (7); AFM(1) (4,775); AFM(2) (0); AFP(1) (661); and AFL (21 µg·kg(-1)). The best AF extraction method was Qian and Yang's method, modified by adding additional AF from both Supelclean LC18 SPE columns; its limit of detection (0.5 ng·mL(-1)) was lower compared with that of Koeltzow and Tanner, which was 1 ng·mL(-1).

A method for the determination of aflatoxicol in urine has been developed. The urine samples were cleaned up by an automated procedure using immunoaffinity columns before analysis by high-performance liquid chromatography and fluorescence detection. Post-column derivatization with bromine allowed the simultaneous determination of aflatoxicol and aflatoxins B1, B2, G1, G2, M1, and Q1. Average recovery of aflatoxicol was 99% in the range 4-40 pg ml-1 of spiked urine samples. The relative standard deviations were all between 1% and 3%. The limit of detection was 1 pg ml-1 urine. Authentic samples from exposed feed-factory workers were analysed, but aflatoxin levels were found to be below the detection limit.