Chromomycin A3

The interaction of chromomycin A3 (an antitumor antibiotic) with right-handed and left-handed polynucleotides has been studied by absorbance, fluorescence, circular dichroism, 31P-NMR and 1H-NMR techniques. Binding to either the B form of poly(dG-dC) or the Z form of poly(dG-m5dC) shifts the absorbance maximum to higher wavelength and enhances the fluorescence of the drug. Circular dichroic spectra of solutions containing various concentrations of chromomycin A3 and fixed concentrations of either B or Z polynucleotides show well defined isoelliptic points at similar wavelengths. At the isoelliptic point, the drug complex with B DNA exhibits positive ellipticity while with Z DNA it exhibits negative ellipticity. 31P-NMR spectra of the chromomycin A3 complex with the Z form of poly(dG-m5dC) demonstrate that the Z conformation is retained in the drug complex up to one molecule drug/four base pairs. At Mg2+ concentrations lower than that necessary to stabilize the left-handed conformation of poly(dG-m5dC) alone, 31P analysis shows that chromomycin A3 can bind simultaneously to both the B and Z conformations of poly(dG-m5dC), with no effect on the B-Z equilibrium. These data demonstrate that chromomycin A3 binds to left-handed poly(dG-m5dC) with retention of the left-handed conformation up to saturating drug concentrations.

The present study highlights the biological effects of chromomycin A2 toward metastatic melanoma cells in culture. Besides chromomycin A2, chromomycin A3 and demethylchromomycin A2 were also identified from the extract derived from Streptomyces sp., recovered from Paracuru Beach, located in the northeast region of Brazil. The cytotoxic activity of chromomycin A2 was evaluated across a panel of human tumor cell lines, which found IC50 values in the nM-range for exposures of 48 and 72 h. MALME-3M, a metastatic melanoma cell line, showed the highest sensitivity to chromomycin A2 after 48h incubation, and was chosen as a model to investigate this potent cytotoxic effect. Treatment with chromomycin A2 at 30 nM reduced cell proliferation, but had no significant effect upon cell viability. Additionally, chromomycin A2 induced accumulation of cells in G0/G1 phase of the cell cycle, with consequent reduction of S and G2/M and unbalanced expression of cyclins. Chromomycin A2 treated cells depicted several cellular fragments resembling autophagosomes and increased expression of proteins LC3-A and LC3-B. Moreover, exposure to chromomycin A2 also induced the appearance of acidic vacuolar organelles in treated cells. These features combined are suggestive of the induction of autophagy promoted by chromomycin A2, a feature not previously described for chromomycins.

Chromomycin A3 is an antitumor antibiotic which blocks macromolecular synthesis via reversible interaction with DNA template only in the presence of divalent metal ions such as Mg2+. The role of Mg2+ in this antibiotic-DNA interaction is not well understood. We approached the problem in two steps via studies on the interaction of (i) chromomycin A3 and Mg2+ and (ii) chromomycin A3-Mg2+ complex(es) and DNA. Spectroscopic techniques such as absorption, fluorescence, and CD were employed for this purpose. The results could be summed up in two parts. Absorption, fluorescence, and CD spectra of the antibiotic change upon addition of Mg2+ due to complex formation between them. Analysis of the quantitative dependence of change in absorbance of chromomycin A3 (at 440 nm) upon input concentration of Mg2+ indicates formation of two types of complexes with different stoichiometries and formation constants. Trends in change of fluorescence and CD spectroscopic features of the antibiotic in the presence of Mg2+ at different concentrations further corroborate this result. The two complexes are referred to as complex I (with 1:1 stoichiometry in terms of chromomycin A3:Mg2+) and complex II (with 2:1 stoichiometry in terms of chromomycin A3:Mg2+), respectively, in future discussions. The interactions of these complexes with calf thymus DNA were examined to check whether they bind differently to the same DNA. Evaluation of binding parameters, intrinsic binding constants, and binding stoichiometry, by means of spectrophotometric and fluorescence titrations, shows that they are different. Distinctive spectroscopic features of complexes I and II, when they are bound to DNA, also support that they bind differently to the above DNA. Measurement of thermodynamic parameters characterizing their interactions with calf thymus DNA shows that complex I-DNA interaction is exothermic, in contrast to complex II-DNA interaction, which is endothermic. This feature implies a difference in the molecular nature of the interactions between the complexes and calf thymus DNA. These observations are novel and significant to understand the antitumor property of the antibiotic. They are also discussed to provide explanations for the earlier reports that in some cases appeared to be contradictory.