Clavulanic acid

* Please be kindly noted products are not for therapeutic use. We do not sell to patients.

Clavulanic acid
Category Enzyme inhibitors
Catalog number BBF-00366
CAS 58001-44-8
Molecular Weight 199.16
Molecular Formula C8H9NO5
Purity 95%

Online Inquiry

Description

It is produced by the strain of Streptomyces clavuligerus. Clavulanic acid has a strong inhibition of β-lactamase activity, almost no antibacterial effect.

Specification

Related CAS 61177-45-5 (monopotassium salt) 57943-81-4 (monohydrochloride salt)
Synonyms Acido clavulanico; Acide clavulanique; acidum clavulanicum; Clavulansaeure
IUPAC Name (2R,3Z,5R)-3-(2-hydroxyethylidene)-7-oxo-4-oxa-1-azabicyclo[3.2.0]heptane-2-carboxylic acid
Canonical SMILES C1C2N(C1=O)C(C(=CCO)O2)C(=O)O
InChI InChI=1S/C8H9NO5/c10-2-1-4-7(8(12)13)9-5(11)3-6(9)14-4/h1,6-7,10H,2-3H2,(H,12,13)/b4-1-/t6-,7-/m1/s1
InChI Key HZZVJAQRINQKSD-PBFISZAISA-N

Properties

Appearance Oil
Boiling Point 545.8±50.0 °C at 760 mmHg
Density 1.65±0.1 g/cm3

Reference Reading

1. Clavulanic Acid in the Scope of Helicobacter pylori Treatment: A Literature Review and Beyond
Nasr Alrabadi, Iyad S Albustami, Husam A Abuhayyeh, Khaled M El-Muwalla, Rama J Alawneh, Laith N Al-Eitan, Karem H Alzoubi, Majed Masadeh, Omar F Khabour, Razan Haddad Curr Rev Clin Exp Pharmacol. 2021;16(2):128-138. doi: 10.2174/1574884715666200702121417.
Background: Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is the most common cause of peptic ulcer disease and it can be associated with many complications, including malignancies. In clinical practice, some clinicians may use Clavulanic Acid (CA) in combination with amoxicillin or other beta-lactams as an addition to the standard treatment regimens. This practice may be done by habitual mistake, non-evidence based hypothetical assumptions, or by prescribing it as an alternative treatment. This review aims to expose the effect of CA against H. pylori infection and to review the possible mechanisms that may contribute to that effect. Methods: A PubMed and Google Scholar literature search was obtained on both pre-clinical and clinical studies related to CA and H. pylori infection. Results: Available clinical studies showed improvement in the eradication of H. pylori by about 10- 20% when CA was added to the treatment regimens. This effect for CA could be related to several mechanisms including inhibition of H. pylori growth by binding to Penicillin-Binding Proteins (PBPs), the transformation of H. pylori from the active filamentous form into coccoidal form, induction of the release of dopamine, modulation of immunological response towards H. pylori infection and its relationship with other microbiota. Randomized-controlled studies on patients with resistance to H. pylori are needed. Moreover, in vitro studies to evaluate the mechanisms by which CA may influence H. pylori are warranted. Conclusion: The presented literature suggests potential avenues for the use of CA in the management of peptic ulcer disease and H. pylori infection.
2. Efficacy and safety of switching from intravenous to oral antibiotics (amoxicillin-clavulanic acid) versus a full course of intravenous antibiotics in neonates with probable bacterial infection (RAIN): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial
Fleur M Keij, René F Kornelisse, Nico G Hartwig, et al. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2022 Nov;6(11):799-809. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(22)00245-0. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
Background: Switching from intravenous antibiotic therapy to oral antibiotic therapy among neonates is not yet practised in high-income settings due to uncertainties about exposure and safety. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of early intravenous-to-oral antibiotic switch therapy compared with a full course of intravenous antibiotics among neonates with probable bacterial infection. Methods: In this multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial, patients were recruited at 17 hospitals in the Netherlands. Neonates (postmenstrual age ≥35 weeks, postnatal age 0-28 days, bodyweight ≥2 kg) in whom prolonged antibiotic treatment was indicated because of a probable bacterial infection, were randomly assigned (1:1) to switch to an oral suspension of amoxicillin 75 mg/kg plus clavulanic acid 18·75 mg/kg (in a 4:1 dosing ratio, given daily in three doses) or continue on intravenous antibiotics (according to the local protocol). Both groups were treated for 7 days. The primary outcome was cumulative bacterial reinfection rate 28 days after treatment completion. A margin of 3% was deemed to indicate non-inferiority, thus if the reinfection rate in the oral amoxicillin-clavulanic acid group was less than 3% higher than that in the intravenous antibiotic group the null hypothesis would be rejected. The primary outcome was assessed in the intention-to-treat population (ie, all patients who were randomly assigned and completed the final follow-up visit on day 35) and the per protocol population. Safety was analysed in all patients who received at least one administration of the allocated treatment and who completed at least one follow-up visit. Secondary outcomes included clinical deterioration and duration of hospitalisation. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03247920, and EudraCT, 2016-004447-36. Findings: Between Feb 8, 2018 and May 12, 2021, 510 neonates were randomly assigned (n=255 oral amoxicillin-clavulanic group; n=255 intravenous antibiotic group). After excluding those who withdrew consent (n=4), did not fulfil inclusion criteria (n=1), and lost to follow-up (n=1), 252 neonates in each group were included in the intention-to-treat population. The cumulative reinfection rate at day 28 was similar between groups (one [<1%] of 252 neonates in the amoxicillin-clavulanic acid group vs one [<1%] of 252 neonates in the intravenous antibiotics group; between-group difference 0 [95% CI -1·9 to 1·9]; pnon-inferiority<0·0001). No statistically significant differences were observed in reported adverse events (127 [50%] vs 113 [45%]; p=0·247). In the intention-to-treat population, median duration of hospitalisation was significantly shorter in the amoxicillin-clavulanic acid group than the intravenous antibiotics group (3·4 days [95% CI 3·0-4·1] vs 6·8 days [6·5-7·0]; p<0·0001). Interpretation: An early intravenous-to-oral antibiotic switch with amoxicillin-clavulanic acid is non-inferior to a full course of intravenous antibiotics in neonates with probable bacterial infection and is not associated with an increased incidence of adverse events. Funding: The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development, Innovatiefonds Zorgverzekeraars, and the Sophia Foundation for Scientific Research.
3. Pharmacokinetics of Clavulanic Acid in the Pediatric Population: A Systematic Literature Review
Fleur M Keij, Gerdien A Tramper-Stranders, Birgit C P Koch, Irwin K M Reiss, Anouk E Muller, René F Kornelisse, Karel Allegaert Clin Pharmacokinet. 2022 May;61(5):637-653. doi: 10.1007/s40262-022-01116-3. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
Background and objective: Clavulanic acid is a commonly used β-lactam inhibitor in pediatrics for a variety of infections. Clear insight into its mode of action is lacking, however, and a target has not been identified. The dosing of clavulanic acid is currently based on that of the partner drug (amoxicillin or ticarcillin). Still, proper dosing of the compound is needed because clavulanic acid has been associated with adverse effects. In this systematic review, we aim to describe the current literature on the pharmacokinetics of clavulanic acid in the pediatric population METHODS: We performed a systematic search in MEDLINE, Embase.com, Cochrane Central, Google Scholar, and Web of Science. We included all published studies reporting pharmacokinetic data on clavulanic acid in neonates and children 0-18 years of age. Results: The search resulted in 18 original studies that met the inclusion criteria. In general, the variation in drug exposure was large, which can be partly explained by differences in disease state, route of administration, or age. Unfortunately, the studies' limited background information hampered in-depth assessment of the observed variability. Conclusion: The pharmacokinetics of clavulanic acid in pediatric patients is highly variable, similar to reports in adults, but more pronounced. Significant knowledge gaps remain with regard to the population-specific explanation for this variability. Model-based pharmacokinetic studies that address both maturational and disease-specific changes in the pediatric population are therefore needed. Furthermore, additional pharmacodynamic studies are needed to define a clear target. The combined outcomes will eventually lead to pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of clavulanic acid and targeted exposure. Clinical trial registration: PROSPERO CRD42020137253.

Recommended Products

BBF-05877 Coenzyme Q10 Inquiry
BBF-00969 Homomycin Inquiry
BBF-01210 Emericid Inquiry
BBF-03880 Cyclopamine Inquiry
BBF-05817 Astaxanthin Inquiry
BBF-00574 Bestatin Inquiry

Bio Calculators

Stock concentration: *
Desired final volume: *
Desired concentration: *

L

* Our calculator is based on the following equation:
Concentration (start) x Volume (start) = Concentration (final) x Volume (final)
It is commonly abbreviated as: C1V1 = C2V2

* Total Molecular Weight:
g/mol
Tip: Chemical formula is case sensitive. C22H30N4O c22h30n40
g/mol
g

Recently viewed products

Online Inquiry

Verification code

Copyright © 2024 BOC Sciences. All rights reserved.

cartIcon
Inquiry Basket