Elsamitrucin

The in vitro activity of elsamicin A (ELS) was investigated compared with that of doxorubicin (DX) on two sensitive breast cancer cell lines: one estrogen receptor-positive (ER+, MCF7) and one estrogen receptor-negative (ER-, MDA-MB-231) line, and on a DX-resistant subline (MCF7DX). The activity of the two drugs was also investigated on 19 clinical breast cancer specimens from untreated patients. The drugs were tested at pharamcologically relevant concentrations, as calculated from the area under the curve for a 3 h exposure to the lethal dose producing 10% mortality (LD10) in mice, and at 10- and 100-fold concentrations. In DX-sensitive lines, a greater inhibition of RNA and DNA precursor incorporation, as well as of cell proliferation, was caused by ELS than by DX. Moreover, the antiproliferative effect was 10-fold higher in the ER+ MCF7 than in the ER- MDA-MB-231 cell line (IC50: 0.25 versus 0.21 micrograms/ml). ELS was cross-resistant to DX in the MCF7DX subline. In clinical specimens, effects on DNA precursor incorporation were more often observed for ELS than for DX at the same drug concentrations. The in vitro sensitivity to ELS was more pronounced for ER+ than for ER- tumors: minimal inhibiting concentrations of the drug were 0.

PURPOSE: ;We undertook a prospective, randomized phase III trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of using a phase II agent before initiating therapy with standard combination chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer patients.;PATIENTS AND METHODS: ;A total of 365 women with measurable metastatic breast cancer, previously untreated with chemotherapy for their metastatic disease, were randomized to receive either immediate chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil (CAF) or up to four cycles of one of five sequential cohorts of single-agent drugs: trimetrexate, melphalan, amonafide, carboplatin, or elsamitrucin, followed by CAF.;RESULTS: ;The toxicity of each single agent followed by CAF was comparable to that of CAF alone. The cumulative response rates for the single agent followed by CAF were not statistically different from those of CAF alone (44% v 52%; P = .24). However, in the multivariate analysis, patients with visceral disease had a trend toward lower response rates on the phase II agent plus CAF arm (P = .078). Although survival and response duration also were not statistically significantly different between the two study arms (P = .074 and P = .069, respectively), there was a suggestion of benefit for the CAF-only arm.

Elsamitrucin (BMY-28090) is an antitumor antibiotic first described in 1985 that has significant oncolytic activity against a number of murine tumors including P388, L1210, B16 and M5076, as well as against MX1 and HCT116 xenografts. Preclinical toxicology studies of elsamitrucin revealed edema of multiple organs associated with hypoproteinemia and, at lethal doses, severe multiorgan toxicity. We conducted a phase I clinical trial (31 patients) of elsamitrucin administered as a 10-min i.v. infusion every 3 weeks. The starting dose (0.6 mg/m2) was 1/3 of the dog low toxic dose. The maximum tolerated dose was 30 mg/m2. Dose-limiting toxicity was reversible hepatic dysfunction manifested by elevated transaminase levels not associated with bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, or lactate dehydrogenase elevations. Other toxicities included nausea, vomiting, malaise, and phlebitis. Because the hepatic toxicity was brief and reversible, a subsequent study (18 patients) was conducted with elsamitrucin administered every 2 weeks. Reversible grade 3 hepatotoxicity was again observed at 30 mg/m2. Plasma and urine samples from patients receiving doses of 0.6-36 mg/m2 were analyzed for drug content. The maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration versus time curve values increased linearly with doses up to 25 mg/m2 but not at higher doses.