Laidlomycin
* Please be kindly noted products are not for therapeutic use. We do not sell to patients.
Category | Antibiotics |
Catalog number | BBF-02644 |
CAS | 56283-74-0 |
Molecular Weight | 698.89 |
Molecular Formula | C37H62O12 |
Purity | 95% |
Online Inquiry
Description
It is produced by the strain of Str. sp. S-822. It is an oxygen-containing heterocyclic antibiotic. It has anti-gram-positive bacterial and mycoplasma activity.
Specification
Synonyms | Laidlomicina; Laidlomycine; Laidlomycinum; 16-Deethyl-3-O-demethyl-16-methyl-3-O-(1-oxopropyl)monensin |
IUPAC Name | (2S,3R,4R)-4-[(2S,5R,7S,8R,9S)-7-hydroxy-2-[(2R,5S)-5-[(2R,3S,5R)-5-[(2S,3S,5R,6R)-6-hydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)-3,5-dimethyloxan-2-yl]-3-methyloxolan-2-yl]-5-methyloxolan-2-yl]-2,8-dimethyl-1,10-dioxaspiro[4.5]decan-9-yl]-2-methyl-3-propanoyloxypentanoic acid |
Canonical SMILES | CCC(=O)OC(C(C)C1C(C(CC2(O1)CCC(O2)(C)C3CCC(O3)(C)C4C(CC(O4)C5C(CC(C(O5)(CO)O)C)C)C)O)C)C(C)C(=O)O |
InChI | InChI=1S/C37H62O12/c1-10-28(40)45-30(24(7)33(41)42)23(6)31-22(5)25(39)17-36(47-31)14-13-34(8,49-36)27-11-12-35(9,46-27)32-20(3)16-26(44-32)29-19(2)15-21(4)37(43,18-38)48-29/h19-27,29-32,38-39,43H,10-18H2,1-9H3,(H,41,42)/t19-,20-,21+,22+,23-,24-,25-,26+,27+,29-,30+,31-,32+,34-,35-,36+,37-/m0/s1 |
InChI Key | ZNBNBTIDJSKEAM-NISBWGIBSA-N |
Properties
Appearance | Colorless Ribbed Crystal |
Antibiotic Activity Spectrum | Gram-positive bacteria; Mycoplasma |
Boiling Point | 791.2°C at 760 mmHg |
Melting Point | 151-153°C |
Density | 1.23 g/cm3 |
Reference Reading
1. Performance of feedlot steers fed diets containing laidlomycin propionate or monensin plus tylosin, and effects of laidlomycin propionate concentration on intake patterns and ruminal fermentation in beef steers during adaptation to a high-concentrate diet
G C Duff, M L Galyean, K J Malcolm J Anim Sci . 1992 Oct;70(10):2950-8. doi: 10.2527/1992.70102950x.
Two hundred eighty-eight beef steers (British x Continental x Brahman) were fed a 90% concentrate diet containing either no ionophore (control), laidlomycin propionate at either 6 or 12 mg/kg of dietary DM, or monensin plus tylosin (31 and 12 mg/kg of DM, respectively). Neither of the two levels of laidlomycin propionate nor monensin plus tylosin affected (P greater than .10) ADG or feed:gain ratio. Monensin plus tylosin reduced (P less than .01) daily DMI for the 161-d trial period compared with the other three treatments. Laidlomycin propionate at 6 mg/kg increased (P less than .05) DMI relative to the control, laidlomycin propionate at 12 mg/kg, and monensin plus tylosin diets during the 2nd wk of the trial and from d 57 to 84. Treatments did not affect carcass measurements. In a second experiment, 12 ruminally cannulated steers were fed diets containing no ionophore or laidlomycin propionate at either 6 or 12 mg/kg of DM. Samples were obtained for two consecutive days while the dietary concentrate level was 75%, after which the diet was switched abruptly to 90% concentrate, and samples were collected on several days during a 21-d period. The rate at which steers consumed their daily allotment of feed was not altered markedly by laidlomycin propionate. Likewise, laidlomycin propionate did not affect total ruminal VFA concentrations or proportions. Ruminal concentrations of D-lactate were reduced (P less than .10) by 6 but not by 12 mg/kg of laidlomycin propionate.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
2. Effects of laidlomycin propionate and monensin on glucose utilization and nutrient transport by Streptococcus bovis and Selenomonas ruminantium
J L Wampler, G M Hill, S A Martin J Anim Sci . 1998 Oct;76(10):2730-6. doi: 10.2527/1998.76102730x.
The objective of this study was to compare the effects of laidlomycin propionate and monensin on cell growth, glucose fermentation, and glucose uptake in Streptococcus bovis strain JB1 and Selenomonas ruminantium strain HD4. Experiments were also conducted to compare the effects of both ionophores on sodium-dependent serine transport and cell yield in S. bovis. Batch cultures (500 mL) of each bacterium were grown on 3.6 g/L D-glucose in semidefined medium and treated with either 5 ppm monensin or 2 ppm laidlomycin propionate (n=2). Cell growth was monitored by measuring optical density at 600 nm (OD600). Glucose and L-lactate concentrations were measured using coupled enzyme assays. In S. bovis, both monensin and laidlomycin propionate decreased OD600, glucose utilization, and L-lactate production. Neither ionophore had any effect on glucose utilization by S. ruminantium. [14C]Glucose uptake between 5 and 30 min by both bacteria was not altered by either ionophore. Sodium-dependent [14C]serine uptake by S. bovis was inhibited by monensin but not laidlomycin propionate. When S. bovis was grown in glucose-limited continuous culture (dilution rate=.10 h(-1)) at extracellular pH 6.7, increasing concentrations of both ionophores decreased bacterial yield, and both ionophores were more potent at an extracellular pH of 5.7. However, monensin was a more potent inhibitor than laidlomycin propionate at pH 6.7 and 5.7. Collectively, these results suggest that the ionophore laidlomycin propionate inhibits the Gram-positive bacterium S. bovis in a manner similar to that of monensin, but, at the concentrations used in this study, laidlomycin propionate seems to be less potent than monensin in inhibiting serine uptake and cell yield.
3. Effects of laidlomycin propionate and monensin on the in vitro mixed ruminal microorganism fermentation
E J Domescik, S A Martin J Anim Sci . 1999 Aug;77(8):2305-12. doi: 10.2527/1999.7782305x.
The objective of this study was to compare the effects of laidlomycin propionate and monensin on the in vitro fermentation of ground corn, Trypticase, or alfalfa hay by mixed ruminal microorganisms. Ruminal fluid was collected from two steers fed 9.27 kg DM of a high-concentrate (62.2% ground corn and 17.4% cottonseed hulls) diet per day and composited. In the first study, no ionophore was included in the diet; the diet in the second study contained 11.1 g of laidlomycin propionate per ton of feed. The animals were allowed an adjustment period of 14 d for each dietary treatment before samples were collected. When ruminal fluid from unadapted animals was used, both monensin and laidlomycin propionate decreased (P<.05) CH4 concentration and the acetate:propionate ratio with ground corn and alfalfa hay. Monensin reduced (P<.05) in vitro dry matter disappearance of alfalfa and increased (P<.05) final pH in the ground corn and alfalfa hay fermentations. Both laidlomycin propionate and monensin decreased (P<.05) concentrations of acetate, propionate, isobutyrate, isovalerate, CH4, and NH3 in Trypticase fermentations. When ruminal fluid from adapted animals was used, both ionophores still reduced the concentrations of most fermentation products. However, there was generally less inhibition compared with fermentations inoculated with unadapted mixed ruminal microorganisms. In the presence of 5 mM maltose, mixed ruminal bacteria produced high concentrations (10 to 11 mM) of lactate, and addition of both ionophores to these fermentations was effective in reducing (P<.05) lactate production. In conclusion, laidlomycin propionate alters the mixed ruminal microorganism fermentation in a manner similar to monensin, but, at the concentrations used in this study, monensin seemed to be a more potent inhibitor.
Recommended Products
BBF-04029 | Folic acid | Inquiry |
BBF-05886 | Notoginsenoside R1 | Inquiry |
BBF-01729 | Hygromycin B | Inquiry |
BBF-00586 | Brefeldin A | Inquiry |
BBF-00664 | Alternariol | Inquiry |
BBF-03973 | Cefpirome sulfate | Inquiry |
Bio Calculators
* Our calculator is based on the following equation:
Concentration (start) x Volume (start) = Concentration (final) x Volume (final)
It is commonly abbreviated as: C1V1 = C2V2
* Total Molecular Weight:
g/mol
Tip: Chemical formula is case sensitive. C22H30N4O √ c22h30n40 ╳