P-132

P-132

* Please be kindly noted products are not for therapeutic use. We do not sell to patients.

Category Antibiotics
Catalog number BBF-03321
CAS
Molecular Weight 254.24
Molecular Formula C14H10N2O3

Online Inquiry

Description

P-132 is an antibiotic produced by Microbispora P-132, W-17 and 37-26. It is effective against gram-positive bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes.

Specification

Synonyms P 132
IUPAC Name N-(3-oxo-3H-phenoxazin-2-yl)acetamide

Properties

Appearance Yellow Needle Crystal
Antibiotic Activity Spectrum Gram-positive bacteria; fungi
Melting Point 295-297°C

Reference Reading

1. Convergence of Targeted and Immune Therapies for the Treatment of Oncogene-Driven Cancers
Adrienne D Cox, Jenny P-Y Ting, Channing J Der Cancer Discov. 2023 Jan 9;13(1):19-22. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-22-1199.
In this issue, Hattori and colleagues capitalized on targeted small-molecule covalent inhibitors of one KRAS mutant with a G12C substitution and of other oncoproteins to create drug-peptide conjugates that serve as cancer neoantigens that prompt an immune response to oncogene-mutant cancer cells. This immunotherapy strategy can serve as an effective approach to overcome the treatment-induced resistance that limits the effectiveness of essentially all small molecule-based targeted anticancer drugs. See related article by Hattori et al., p. 132 (9).
2. Psychosexual Morbidity in Women With Ovarian Cancer: Evaluation by Germline BRCA Gene Mutational Status
Chloe A Logue, Julia Pugh, Philip Foden, Reem D Mahmood, Robert D Morgan, Claire Mitchell, Jurjees Hasan, Andrew R Clamp, Gordon C Jayson Sex Med. 2022 Feb;10(1):100465. doi: 10.1016/j.esxm.2021.100465. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
Introduction: Up to 75% of women with ovarian cancer experience psychosexual morbidity and approximately 15-20% of women with ovarian cancer have a germline BRCA1/2 mutation (gBRCAm). However, psychosexual morbidity remains unexplored in women with gBRCAm ovarian cancer. Aim: Given their younger age, genetic diagnosis, breast cancer risk, and increased prevalence of surgically-induced menopause, we aim to assess whether women with gBRCAm ovarian cancer experience distinct psychosexual morbidity. Methods: Psychosexual morbidity was investigated in 2 cohorts of women with ovarian cancer: women with gBRCAm ovarian cancer vs women with gBRCA wildtype (gBRCAwt) ovarian cancer. Between August 2019 and March 2020, women with high-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary, Fallopian tube or primary peritoneum were approached in clinic or telephoned and invited to take part. Exclusion criteria included: women with alternative histology; women admitted from clinic; and women who lacked capacity to independently complete the questionnaire. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and background information were collected at a single time-point per patient. Scores below 26.55 were interpreted to suggest psychosexual dysfunction. Main outcome measure: Responses including total and domain FSFI scores, self-reported psychosexual problems and interest in psychosexual support were compared. Results: Of 103 women approached, 53% returned questionnaires. In this exploratory analysis, women with gBRCAm ovarian cancer were significantly younger (51-60 years vs 61-70 years, gBRCAwt, P = .010). There was a trend towards increased prevalence of surgical menopause (57% vs 27%, P = .097) and breast surgery (53% vs 22%, P = .132, gBRCAm vs gBRCAwt, respectively). Women with gBRCAm ovarian cancer scored higher in the FSFI questionnaire, particularly women under 60 years (15.1 vs 2.7, P = .070), approaching significance. Women with gBRCAm ovarian cancer expressed more interest for face-to-face services (P = .018), especially psychosexual therapy (65% vs 30%) and more often felt the service was insufficient, approaching significance (71% vs 44%, gBRCAm vs gBRCAwt, respectively, P = .076). Conclusion: Women with gBRCAm ovarian cancer are younger, express more interest for specialist psychosexual support and potentially different psychosexual problems, warranting further exploration. Logue C, Pugh J, Foden P, et al., Psychosexual Morbidity in Women With Ovarian Cancer: Evaluation by Germline BRCA Gene Mutational Status. Sex Med 2022;10:100465.
3. Intrastromal corneal ring segments followed by PRK for postkeratoplasty high astigmatism: prospective study
Pedro Bertino, Renata Soares Magalhães, Carlos José de Souza Jr, Guilherme Rocha, Marcony R Santhiago J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022 Aug 1;48(8):912-923. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000888.
Purpose: To evaluate refractive and topographic results of the association of intrastromal corneal ring segments (ICRS) with photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for the correction of high (>6.0 diopters [D]) postkeratoplasty astigmatism (PKA). Setting: University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. Design: Prospective interventional study. Methods: Postpenetrating keratoplasty patients, intolerant to contact lens fitting, and with corneal astigmatism higher than 6.0 D were treated by the combination of ICRS and PRK from January 2017 to June 2019. First, patients underwent femtosecond laser-assisted ICRS implantation to reduce and regularize corneal astigmatism, and 3 months later, submitted to PRK for the residual astigmatism. Outcomes were obtained 12 months after PRK. Results: The study comprised 30 eyes of 29 patients. Mean uncorrected distance visual acuity (logMAR) changed from 1.16 ± 0.37 in the preoperative to 0.69 ± 0.40 after ICRS ( P < .0001) and to 0.34 ± 0.29 12 months after PRK ( P < .0001). Mean spherical equivalent decreased from -5.19 ± 4.81 D in the preoperative to -3.38 ± 4.51 D after ICRS ( P < .0001) and to -2.30 ± 2.84 D after PRK ( P = .132). Mean topographic astigmatism decreased from 7.88 ± 2.13 D in the preoperative to 5.47 ± 2.29 D after ICRS ( P < .0001) and to 4.12 ± 2.93 D after PRK ( P = .003). Mean refractive astigmatism decreased from 7.10 ± 1.13 D in the preoperative to 4.61 ± 1.61 D after ICRS ( P < .0001) and to 2.58 ± 1.49 D after PRK ( P < .0001). After PRK, the mean correction index (CI) for corneal astigmatism was 0.77 ± 0.36. The ICRS/PRK combination resulted in a higher CI than ICRS only, both for corneal and refractive astigmatism. 2 eyes (8%) presented clinically significant opacification. Other complications were endothelial rejection (n = 1, 4%), infectious keratitis (n = 1, 4%), and ICRS extrusion after corneal melting (n = 1, 4%). Conclusions: The association of ICRS and PRK was effective for treating high PKA. This strategy improved visual acuity, spherical equivalent, topographic and refractive astigmatism and resulted in a high CI. Safety questions remain open and must be balanced against benefits.

Recommended Products

Bio Calculators

Stock concentration: *
Desired final volume: *
Desired concentration: *

L

* Our calculator is based on the following equation:
Concentration (start) x Volume (start) = Concentration (final) x Volume (final)
It is commonly abbreviated as: C1V1 = C2V2

* Total Molecular Weight:
g/mol
Tip: Chemical formula is case sensitive. C22H30N4O c22h30n40
g/mol
g

Recently viewed products

Online Inquiry

Verification code
cartIcon
Inquiry Basket