Standard Solution Nivalenol

The lack of reliable, certified calibrant solutions for the Fusarium mycotoxins deoxynivalenol (DON), 3-acetyl-DON (3-Ac-DON), 15-acetyl-DON (15-Ac-DON) and nivalenol (NIV) is a serious drawback in the already problematic area of trichothecene analysis. For this reason, purified DON, 3-Ac-DON, 15-Ac-DON and NIV standards were processed, the conditions required for their isolation and purification were optimised, and the crystalline toxins were thoroughly characterised. Several complimentary analytical methods were used to evaluate the identities of the mycotoxins and the types and amounts of impurities; results obtained from 1H and 13C NMR spectra, as well as from IR-spectra, were in agreement with the literature. Elemental analysis revealed that the isolated NIV occurs as monohydrate. If this is not known it results in a weighing error of approximately 5%. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was only successful for 15-Ac-DON, as the other trichothecenes decomposed during measurements. No traces of chloride, nitrate and sulphate were found by means of ion chromatography (IC). As expected UV absorption spectra for DON, NIV, 3-Ac-DON and 15-Ac-DON yielded lambda(max) values of 216, 217, 217 and 219 nm, respectively. Minor peaks due to impurities were observed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with UV detection. The main impurity peak in the DON sample was identified by LC-tandem mass spectroscopy (LC-MS/MS) as 4,7-dideoxy-NIV (7-deoxy-DON), which occurs at levels of approximately 1.4%. Gas chromatography (GC) was performed, coupled with either an electron capture detector (ECD), a flame ionisation detector (FID), or a mass spectrometric detector (MS); however, derivatisation prior to GC analysis makes the estimation of impurities difficult. LC-MS/MS was found to be unsuitable for quantifying levels of impurities. It can be concluded that high-purity (>97%) B-trichothecene standards were successfully processed and fully characterised for the first time.

Thirteen European laboratories experienced in the analysis of mycotoxins participated in an intercomparison study within a European Commission-funded project. Goals of the study were to check the fitness for purpose of a small batch of gravimetrically prepared calibrants; to compare individually prepared calibrants with common calibrants; to check the feasibility of toxin mixtures as calibrant solutions; and to give recommendations on the production of future certified reference materials (CRMs) with regard to the nature of the calibrant and the means of certification. Each laboratory received ampules of each common calibrant containing single toxins [solution containing either deoxynivalenol (DON), 3-acetyl-DON (3-Ac-DON), nivalenol (NIV), or 15-acetyl-DON (15-Ac-DON)] and 3 ampules of toxin-mixture (solutions of DON + 3-Ac-DON + NIV in acetonitrile) of known concentrations (about 20 microg/mL). Ampules with single toxins (solution containing either DON, 3-Ac-DON, NIV, or 15-Ac-DON) and a toxin-mixture (solutions of DON + 3-Ac-DON + NIV in acetonitrile) of unknown concentrations were distributed to the participants for quantification. The participating laboratories used mainly high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-diode array detection UV for DON, 3-Ac-DON, NIV, and 15-Ac-DON; gas chromatography-electron capture detection (GC-ECD) and GC-mass spectrometry methods were used sparingly. Linear calibration curves were achieved by >90% of the participants. Relative between-day variation (RSDr) of 26% of the laboratories was greater than the target value of 5% for HPLC, and RSDr of 32% of the laboratories was greater than the desired value of 10% for GC. Relative between-laboratory variation (RSDR) of the GC results obtained with single common calibrants was greater than the target value of 16% for all laboratories. RSDR of the HPLC results for the common unknown single toxin solutions was less than the target value of 8% except for 15-Ac-DON. Generally, better recoveries were observed from common calibrants (102% for mix calibrants and 98% for single calibrants) than from individually prepared calibrants (95%). This international comparison study clearly showed the high scattering of results in the analysis of type-B trichothecenes, particularly when GC was used. Obviously, this intercomparison study was not suited for the certification of B-trichothecenes. A certification of the proposed calibrant material was therefore recommended on the basis of its gravimetrical preparation.

The effects of moisture, pH and heat on the stability of nivalenol (NIV), deoxtnivalenol (DON) and zearalenone (ZEN) present as natural contaminants of ground maize were measured for different periods. Standard solution tests were also performed to measure pH, salt and temperature effects on NIV and DON. The solution tests showed NIV and DON to be relatively stable in buffer solutions over the pH range 1-10. Quite harsh conditions (pH 12, high salt concentration, 80 degrees C, prolonged exposure) were needed to give substantial breakdown. In the ground maize substrate, these toxins were further stabilized relative to the solution tests. NIV and DON were both reduced (range 60-100%) by treatment with aqueous bicarbonate solution at 10, 20 or 50% of the ground maize dry weight, and subsequent heating at 80 or 110 degrees C for 2 and 12 days. There was no measurable reduction at lower test temperatures (20, 40 degrees C). NIV (but not DON) also showed some reduction following addition of water and heating at 80 or 110 degrees C for 12 days. ZEN content was not reduced even by 12 days of heating at 110 degrees C after treatment with a sodium bicarbonate solution.