Bambermycin

* Please be kindly noted products are not for therapeutic use. We do not sell to patients.

Bambermycin
Category Antibiotics
Catalog number BBF-03796
CAS 11015-37-5
Molecular Weight 1583.56
Molecular Formula C69H107N4O35P
Purity >95% by HPLC, Moenomycin complex. Mixture of Moenomycin A, Moenomycin A12, Moenomycin C1, Moenomycin C3, Moenomycin C4

Online Inquiry

Description

Bambermycin (flavomycin) is a complex of antibiotics obtained from Streptomyces bambergiensis and Streptomyces ghanaensis used as a food additive for beef cattle, dairy cattle, poultry and swine. The complex consists mainly of moenomycins A and C.

Specification

Synonyms Moenomycin complex; Flavomycin
Storage Store at -20°C
IUPAC Name (2S,3S,4R,5R,6R)-5-[(2S,3R,4R,5S,6R)-3-acetamido-5-[(2S,3R,4R,5S)-3-acetamido-4-hydroxy-6-methyl-5-[(2R,3R,4S,5R,6S)-3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-[(2-hydroxy-5-oxocyclopenten-1-yl)carbamoyl]oxan-2-yl]oxyoxan-2-yl]oxy-4-hydroxy-6-[[(2R,3R,4S,5S,6R)-3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)oxan-2-yl]oxymethyl]oxan-2-yl]oxy-4-carbamoyloxy-6-[[(2R)-2-carboxy-2-[(2E,6E,13E)-3,8,8,14,18-pentamethyl-11-methylidenenonadeca-2,6,13,17-tetraenoxy]ethoxy]-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-3-hydroxy-3-methyloxane-2-carboxylic acid
Canonical SMILES CC1C(C(C(C(O1)OC2C(OC(C(C2O)NC(=O)C)OC3C(C(C(OC3OP(=O)(O)OCC(C(=O)O)OCC=C(C)CCC=CC(C)(C)CCC(=C)CC=C(C)CCC=C(C)C)C(=O)O)(C)O)OC(=O)N)COC4C(C(C(C(O4)CO)O)O)O)NC(=O)C)O)OC5C(C(C(C(O5)C(=O)NC6=C(CCC6=O)O)O)O)O
InChI InChI=1S/C69H107N4O35P/c1-30(2)15-14-17-31(3)18-19-33(5)22-25-68(9,10)24-13-12-16-32(4)23-26-96-41(60(88)89)29-98-109(94,95)108-66-56(57(107-67(70)92)69(11,93)58(106-66)61(90)91)105-63-44(72-36(8)76)47(81)54(40(101-63)28-97-64-51(85)48(82)45(79)39(27-74)100-64)103-62-43(71-35(7)75)46(80)53(34(6)99-62)102-65-52(86)49(83)50(84)55(104-65)59(87)73-42-37(77)20-21-38(42)78/h13,15,18,23-24,34,39-41,43-58,62-66,74,77,79-86,93H,5,12,14,16-17,19-22,25-29H2,1-4,6-11H3,(H2,70,92)(H,71,75)(H,72,76)(H,73,87)(H,88,89)(H,90,91)(H,94,95)/b24-13+,31-18+,32-23+/t34?,39-,40-,41-,43-,44-,45-,46-,47-,48+,49+,50-,51-,52-,53-,54-,55+,56-,57-,58-,62+,63+,64-,65-,66-,69+/m1/s1
InChI Key PERZMHJGZKHNGU-XIGAONJHSA-N
Source Streptomyces sp.

Properties

Appearance White to Off-white Solid
Density 1.47 g/cm3
Solubility Soluble in ethanol, methanol, DMF, DMSO

Reference Reading

1. Affinity-Based Screen for Inhibitors of Bacterial Transglycosylase
Ting-Jen R Cheng, Wei-Shen Wu, Chi-Huey Wong, Wei-Chieh Cheng J Am Chem Soc . 2018 Feb 28;140(8):2752-2755. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b13205.
The rise of antibiotic resistance has created a mounting crisis across the globe and an unmet medical need for new antibiotics. As part of our efforts to develop new antibiotics to target the uncharted surface bacterial transglycosylase, we report an affinity-based ligand screen method using penicillin-binding proteins immobilized on beads to selectively isolate the binders from complex natural products. In combination with mass spectrometry and assays with moenomycin A and salicylanilide analogues (1-10) as reference inhibitors, we isolated four potent antibacterials confirmed to be benastatin derivatives (11-13) and albofungin (14). Compounds 11 and 14 were effective antibiotics against a broad-spectrum of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, including Acinetobacter baumannii, Clostridium difficile, Staphylococcus aureus, and drug-resistant strains with minimum inhibitory concentrations in the submicromolar to nanomolar range.
2. Effects of litter from antimicrobial-fed broiler chickens on soil bacterial community structure and diversity
Md Rashedul Islam, Rose E Mastin-Wood, Moussa S Diarra, Shabtai Bittman, Xin Zhao, Bilal Muhammad, Edward Topp, Dion Lepp Can J Microbiol . 2022 Oct 1;68(10):643-653. doi: 10.1139/cjm-2022-0086.
This study examined changes in soil bacterial community composition and diversity in response to fertilization with litter from chickens fed a diet without antibiotics and with bambermycin, penicillin, bacitracin, salinomycin, or mix of salinomycin and bacitracin. Litter (27.5 T/ha) was applied to 24 agricultural plots in the Fraser Valley of British Columbia. Nonfertilized plots were used as a negative control. Soil samples collected from the studied plots were used to quantifyEscherichia coliby plate counts, andClostridium perfringensby qPCR. The 16S rRNA gene sequencing was performed for microbiota analysis. Following litter application in December, the population size ofE. coliwas 5.4 log CFU/g; however, regardless of treatments, the results revealed 5.2 and 1.4 log CFU/g ofE. coliin soil sampled in January and March, respectively. Fertilization with litter from antibiotic-treated birds increased (P< 0.05) the relative abundance of Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Firmicutes in soil, but decreased Acidobacteria and Verrucomicrobia groups. The alpha diversity parameters were higher (P< 0.05) in nonfertilized soil compared to the fertilized ones, suggesting that litter application was a major factor in shaping the soil bacterial communities. These results may help develop efficient litter management strategies like composting, autoclaving, or anaerobic digestion of poultry litter before application to land for preservation of soil health and crop productivity.
3. Effects of rotating antibiotic and ionophore feed additives on volatile fatty acid production, potential for methane production, and microbial populations of steers consuming a moderate-forage diet
M D Miller, W B Smith, M Cravey, W L Crossland, L O Tedeschi, T R Callaway J Anim Sci . 2017 Oct;95(10):4554-4567. doi: 10.2527/jas2017.1665.
Ionophores and antibiotics have been shown to decrease ruminal methanogenesis both in vitro and in vivo but have shown little evidence toward a sustainable means of mitigation. Feed additive rotation was proposed and investigated for methane, VFA, and microbial population response. In the present study, cannulated steers ( = 12) were fed a moderate-forage basal diet in a Calan gate facility for 13 wk. In addition to the basal diet, steers were randomly assigned to 1 of 6 treatments: 1) control, no additive; 2) bambermycin, 20 mg bambermycin/d; 3) monensin, 200 mg monensin/d; 4) the basal diet + weekly rotation of bambermycin and monensin treatments (B7M); 5) the basal diet + rotation of bambermycin and monensin treatments every 14 d (B14M); and 6) the basal diet + rotation of bambermycin and monensin treatments every 21 d (B21M). Steers were blocked by weight in a randomized complete block design where the week was the repeated measure. Rumen fluid was collected weekly for analysis ( = 13), and results were normalized according to individual OM intake (OMI; kg/d). Potential activity of methane production was not significantly different among treatments ( > 0.05). However, treatment tended to affect the CH-to-propionate ratio ( = 0.0565), which was highest in the control and lowest in the monensin, B21M, and B14M treatments (0.42 vs. 0.36, 0.36, and 0.33, respectively). The CH:propionate ratio was lowest in wk 2 and 3 ( < 0.05) but the ratio in wk 4 to 12 was not different from the ratio in wk 0. Week also affected total VFA, with total VFA peaking at wk 3 and plummeting at wk 4 (4.02 vs. 2.86 m/kg OMI; < 0.05). A significant treatment × week interaction was observed for the acetate-to-propionate (A:P) ratio, where bambermycin- and rotationally fed steers did not have a reduced A:P ratio compared with monensin-fed steers throughout the feeding period ( < 0.0001). Microbial analysis revealed significant shifts, but several predominant classes showed adaptation between 4 and 6 wk after additive initiation. There was no significant evidence to suggest that rotations of monensin and bambermycin provided additional benefits to steers consuming a moderate-forage diet at the microbial/animal and environmental level versus those continuously fed.

Recommended Products

BBF-05763 Cyclosporin C Inquiry
BBF-03868 Honokiol Inquiry
BBF-03756 Amygdalin Inquiry
BBF-03753 Baicalin Inquiry
BBF-00969 Homomycin Inquiry
BBF-05734 Irofulven Inquiry

Bio Calculators

Stock concentration: *
Desired final volume: *
Desired concentration: *

L

* Our calculator is based on the following equation:
Concentration (start) x Volume (start) = Concentration (final) x Volume (final)
It is commonly abbreviated as: C1V1 = C2V2

* Total Molecular Weight:
g/mol
Tip: Chemical formula is case sensitive. C22H30N4O c22h30n40
g/mol
g

Recently viewed products

Online Inquiry

Verification code

Copyright © 2024 BOC Sciences. All rights reserved.

cartIcon
Inquiry Basket